Wednesday, December 15, 2010

co-ed VS. separate education

Here's a discussion I had recently...

er>I am doing a lot of research on the subject, and I happen to believe that girls and boys should be educated separately. They learn differently, they have different needs...I really think they would thrive if they were separated. What do you guys think?

me>I disagree 100%. The only way to lucratively educate children is to immerse them in the systems of the world that surrounds them. That means being involved with the opposite sex socially, and being comfortable cooperating with them as well.
Of course people familiar with single-sex education would advocate it. However, I believe such a thing is antithetical to equality and familiarity between the sexes, which I consider to be quite important. Perhaps some studies show different thinking processes between men and women: true, but some studies also show some women think as men and some men think as women! Granted, such studies refer to homosexuality. However, the day we separate education by sexuality is a sad day indeed.
There's a reason why "separate but equal" failed to satisfy the people who got the short end of the stick. The sexes should not be separated any more than should people of differing races and especially classes, but I feel class equality is a much greater goal than gender equality.
That said, I agree that people with different learning patters should be taught differently. I am one of those people, and public school has failed to cater to my unique learning strategy. I am adapting! The point is that gender has little to do with education. We should look at boys and girls as unique equivalents. I feel that same-sex education fails to do this.

er>Well I feel that they can get the exposure of the other sex in college- I feel that girls in particularly, in the areas of math and science might not shut down as much. And also- let's not forget that boys and girls are different! They learn differently and have different needs. It's too hard to adhere to those differences if the class room is mixed up.

me>Do you really think the co-ed experience should be introduced only at adulthood? That seems like a lot of problems waiting to happen, to me.
I addressed that; I believe that it's a specific case for each individual child as we are all so different mentally that it only makes sense for there to be different learning methods presented to us. I do not, however, believe that these learning differences are limited to the differences between male and female brains.
Ideally we would be separated and taught according to our strengths and learning patterns, regardless of gender. Girls will have girls to sympathize with, as will boys. But they will also have each other to reflect upon and brighten their impressions of both. We have differences which should be addressed, but more important are our similarities. Humans, prone to prejudice and megalomania, need to be humbled by recognition that all of us are equal. What better way to do this than to disregard our differences, (which become trivial on the subject of education) including race, gender, and class.
I admit I've digressed a bit.

What do you think?

Monday, December 13, 2010

thoughts

My dad and I like to discuss physics, and time/space a lot. I do a lot of thinking on it.
Today we discussed how other civilizations in the galaxy or universe might be living, and how similar they might be to Earth.
Now, I am a big fan of technology and our universe, so I like to think about what sorts of ways other civilizations have manipulated their surroundings and if they have discovered life.

I guess recent reading has ensured I can't think about these civilizations without attributing too much human nature to them, as we're seeing how that's turning out. It's actually quite depressing for me. I'm so detached from the world we've made that I get depressed thinking it will be the only chance we have, the only hub from which to draw insight.
I guess there's legitimate scientific grounds on which to claim that all intelligent civilizations bear human-esque qualities, but let's be frank: the "human" way, the way we're doing things now, isn't really getting us anywhere!

What if there is a species out there, on a large planet, which has developed formidable technology without desecrating their resources? A way of life without competition, win, loss, or class?

Thinking about it makes the current human system seem primitive, based upon reptilian instincts of violence, dominance and rage. We're smart enough to live without those things. Why do we indulge in them? I don't think I'll ever have a reason.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

just the same

It's been a while. Sorry, blog :( I've had a lot of things to do. Too many things. But I've still been reading, and going to school (unfortunately,) so I guess I have a few things to talk about. I finally got diagnosed and treated so I'm doing a lot better health-wise.

The book I want to talk about, Creating a World That Works For All, surrounds a familiar topic for me, but approaches it quite differently. The author, Sharif Abdullah, believes we can indeed save humanity, by taking small and large steps in physical and mental lifestyle.

I have to say, the tone seems a bit similar to some self-help books I've read, but instead of self-help, it's world-help. Which is self-help, in effect. What I mean to say is, it offers ways to help yourself think about the world differently, which makes it similar to Endgame. They both insist that the only way we can save ourselves is to think of ourselves as fundamentally connected to all parts of the Earth.

I'll write more about it later. I want to write more in this blog. My current English class is so dissatisfying, it renders me to a (depraved) state of ennui and frustration. I have not written a single essay or paragraph, even, of anything but stale character analysis and reviews of books that I've written one thousand times before. It's one of the most disappointing things ever. I despise highschool almost as much as I despise sleeping. I still spend about equal times doing both.

I must say I agree with it. It's helped me make a lot of decisions. I'm one of those people who thinks far too much for their own good. I think I want to be a teacher.
A big part of me still wants to work with art, but I think that's because it's so easy for me. I'll figure something out. Probably!

It doesn't feel good to have people give up on you. My grades aren't the best thing ever, so my dad won't let me take college classes, and my psychotherapist tells me that (due to my "condition") I probably wouldn't succeed in college anyway.

It's the first time anyone has ever even suggested to me that I might not go to college.
Needless to say I'm still vehement about going.
I need to impress somebody, sometime, or at least prove them wrong.
I know I can help a lot of people someday, if they'll let me, and if I'll succeed. Success is so fickle in meaning!

I'll start writing a lot more often from now on. I owe it to myself. I have to document something about some part of my life or it's like it didn't happen!